I didn't think it was possible....

• Elliot Stabler

  Really??
  
  Shows how much you know about me genius
  
  Glad to see you and some of your Republicans cohorts took sometime off from spanking your monkeys to Newt and Rush's pictures
• CenterBHSFan

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: Really??
  
  Shows how much you know about me genius
  
  Glad to see you and some of your Republicans cohorts took sometime off from spanking your monkeys to Newt and Rush's pictures

  
  Well at least the record isn't skipping on "whatever you say my friend"
• majorspark

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: Really??
  
  Shows how much you know about me genius

  Thats why I said "appear". I only know you from your posts. Your posts indicate such. If you can provide m with a post that shows you hopping out of the sack go ahead. Maybe I will change my evaluation of you.
  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: Glad to see you and some of your Republicans cohorts took sometime off from spanking your monkeys to Newt and Rush's pictures

  I would not vote for Newt for dog catcher. I like reading his history books and listening to his commentary. As for Rush I listen to his program now and again. As for spanking monkeys, not so much.
• Elliot Stabler

  I've stated multiple times that I plan on voting for Bobby Jindal in 2016
  
  That enough proof
• majorspark

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: I've stated multiple times that I plan on voting for Bobby Jindal in 2016
  
  That enough proof

  You would definitely be hopping out of the sack with Jindal. But judging from your posts you have nothing in common with the man.
• Elliot Stabler

  I trust him more than any of the potential Dems right now that might run in 2016
• majorspark

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: I trust him more than any of the potential Dems right now that might run in 2016

  Looks like you got something in common with Limbaugh. He likes Jindal as well.
• 2trap_4ever

  Elliot I know that the libs around me didn't give Bush a chance from day one. I myself honestly tried to give Obama a chance and he has burned me and all whats worse is all of my close friends and family that are Democrats are ready to vote Republican. Obama and this Congress has lost the way of the Democrat party and are taking it down a road that a lot of Dems don't want to go. Anyway, for you to say that Dems gave Bush a chance is laughable, and I think you bring this up due to the facts that you know Obama is doing wrong and anyway to bring up Bush and push things on him is the number one rule out of the Obama playbook.
• GeneralsIcer89

  As I said in the healthcare topic - only one mistake has been made by anyone, but we continue to make it, and that mistake has been to trust the government, no matter who was in charge.
• believer

  

  2trap_4ever wrote:Obama and this Congress has lost the way of the Democrat party and are taking it down a road that a lot of Dems don't want to go.

  When the blue dog Dems wrestle power from the extreme left-wing kooks who currently control the party then things might change. Until then fasten your seat belts because the BHO, Pelosi, & Reid Express is chuggin' along. Woo! Woo!
• Writerbuckeye

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote:

  believer wrote:

  Elliot Stabler wrote: I'm talking about right from the very very start p-town
  
  The majority of the American Public(including liberals) were willing to give Bush a chance. The hatered came later
  
  Republicans have never given President Obama a chance

  
  
  You obviously forget the specter of several weeks of bogus recount after recount. You forget the media declaring Gore the winner and then watching some of them actually shed tears when the U.S. Supreme Court smacked down the Florida Supreme Court allowing the Florida Secretary of State to finally certify that Bush had carried the state giving Bush the WH.
  
  

  You can't possible believe that Bush won the election fair.
  
  Watch Recount. If you can watch that movie and still believe that Bush won fair,I feel very,very sorry for you. There was so much corruption in that election on the side of the Bush campaign it was sickening.
  
  
  
  The Supreme Court gave Bush the presidency,plain and simple.
  
  Even with all that,I was willing to give him a chance,as was my entire family,and most of the Dems/Liberals I know.

  You're seriously using an HBO MOVIE to back your claim that the election was stolen?
  
  How pathetic -- but not unexpected.
• Elliot Stabler

  No...I'm using the book that the movie was based on
  
  Look it up pal
  
  You can find the information all the internet if you want to look
• wkfan

  Elliot Stabler wrote: No...I'm using the book that the movie was based on
  
  Look it up pal
  
  You can find the information all the internet if you want to look

  Usually, those who make the assertion...offer up the proof.
  
  Not in this case, I guess.
• Elliot Stabler

  I've provided the proof time and time again...
  
  I'm not going to do it anymore
• wkfan

  Elliot Stabler wrote: I've provided the proof time and time again...
  
  I'm not going to do it anymore

  
  Chud, I guess your definition of proof is different than mine.
  
  I looked at each and every post of yours in this thread...nothing by assertions and accusations with nothing to back it up.
  
  You have failed.
• Elliot Stabler

  I'm not chud asshole...so stop accusing me of it
  
  You want proof...here
  
  
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  
  
  
  Election 2004
  No telling if voter rolls are ready for 2004
  In 2000, some people were mistakenly labeled felons and denied voting rights. Despite three years of reform efforts, inconsistencies and obstacles remain.
  By ADAM C. SMITH
  Published December 21, 2003
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  David Murry had regularly voted for 20 years, so the mechanic didn't think twice when he showed up at his Seminole precinct in November 2000 to vote for president.
  
  But poll workers wouldn't let him cast a ballot.
  
  Murry was a felon, they said, and they brushed aside his protests that their records were wrong. The apologetic letter he later received from the Pinellas County elections office acknowledging the mistake offered little solace.
  
  "This was a presidential election. It was very important," Murry recalled last week. "I never did anything to deserve it, but they denied me my constitutional right to vote."
  
  How many voters were incorrectly removed from voter rolls before the 2000 election remains unclear. The controversy spawned conspiracy theories, lawsuits and election-reform efforts, including a more accurate method for flagging illegal voters.
  
  But less than a year before Floridians vote again for president, the election system remains bedeviled by inconsistencies, red tape and potential obstacles to prospective voters:
  
  The state put together a list of 12,000 people - 41 percent of whom are African-American - who may have been misidentified as felons and denied the right to vote in 2000. But after completing the list, elections officials acknowledge it is inexact and still may include felons who should not be allowed to vote in 2004.
  
  The counties have been told to deal with inconsistencies in the list as best they can. Some are returning to the rolls any voters who the county can't prove are felons. But others are making voters prove they aren't felons in order to vote next year.
  
  Despite a legal settlement to make it easier for felons to regain their voting rights, the backlog of former prisoners who have applied to restore their rights has grown to nearly 39,000. That's a six-fold increase since 2001, yet the state earlier this year cut the number of Parole Commission staffers who handle applications.
  
  In 2004, could Florida voters again be wrongfully denied their voting rights?
  
  "I don't know that I can answer that," said Secretary of State Glenda Hood, whom Gov. Jeb Bush appointed to succeed Katherine Harris as the state's top elections official.
  
  Attorney Cara Fineman of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights, one of several groups that sued the state for disenfranchising minority voters in 2000, said "I don't think any of us would feel comfortable saying it's fixed. I think the Division of Elections is moving in the right direction."
  
  The problems exposed in the 2000 election prompted the state to ease off its aggressive purge of suspected illegal voters for the 2002 gubernatorial election. But state elections officials say they're employing a better process with more stringent rules for identifying felons who are registered to vote and will be ready for the Aug. 31 primary.
  
  "There's still a bit of testing to go through, but we're very, very close to having it fixed," said Division of Elections director Ed Kast.
  
  Some local elections administrators are skeptical.
  
  "What we got in 2000 was a mess. It was a free-for-all," said Indian River County Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem, who heads the state association of elections supervisors. "I don't know what it's going to take to make a lot of us feel comfortable with it this time."
  
  http://www.sptimes.com/2003/12/21/State/No_telling_if_voter_r.shtml
  
  Voter role purge in the 2000 Florida election
  Prior to the 2000 election, Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris and Governor Jeb Bush hired Database Technologies to purge 82,389 voters whose names matched or were similar to those of ex-felons. An investigation by Leon County Elections Supervisor Ion Sancho revealed that 95% of those purged in his county were, in fact, legally entitled to vote. Greg Palast of the BBC found that more than half those wrongly purged were African-Americans, even though African-Americans represent only about 11% of the electorate and that the purge list contained almost no Hispanics, notwithstanding Florida’s sizable Hispanic population. (In Florida, Hispanics vote mostly Republican, and African Americans vote overwhelmingly Democratic.) [15]
  
  http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Voter_role_purge_in_the_2000_Florida_election
  
  Do you want some more???
• FatHobbit

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: The state put together a list of 12,000 people - 41 percent of whom are African-American - who may have been misidentified as felons and denied the right to vote in 2000.

  Elliot Stabler wrote:Greg Palast of the BBC found that more than half those wrongly purged were African-Americans,

  Seems like your two sources can't even agree on how many african americans were denied the right to vote.
• Elliot Stabler

  I provide fact....and you still try to dispute it
  
  Nice try
• FatHobbit

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: I provide fact....and you still try to dispute it
  
  Nice try

  Lol, but you're not bitter that Bush won the election. I'm sure you gave him every chance that the repubs are now not giving Obama.
  
  And if you did provide facts, your facts were conflicting. That was all I wanted to point out.
• Elliot Stabler

  As a matter a fact...I wanted Bush to win in 2000
  
  My 2nd favorite President is Bill Clinton
  
  I was only 11...so I didn't understand why he couldn't be President again,so I thought Al gore was trying to push him out
  
  I supported Bush and wanted him to win....but after the whole Recount mess,I did like him anymore but was willing to give him a chance
  
  He had plenty of chances to keep that chance....but he blew everyone of those
• FatHobbit

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: As a matter a fact...I wanted Bush to win in 2000
  
  My 2nd favorite President is Bill Clinton
  
  I was only 11...so I didn't understand why he couldn't be President again,so I thought Al gore was trying to push him out
  
  I supported Bush and wanted him to win....but after the whole Recount mess,I did like him anymore but was willing to give him a chance
  
  He had plenty of chances to keep that chance....but he blew everyone of those

  Sooooo, you were eleven years old and a fan of Bill Clinton. But you wanted Bush to win. (that sounds almost believable) And then, as an eleven year old, you were so disgusted by the recount mess that you decided you didn't like him anymore. But.... you gave him *plenty* of chances, even though you already admit you didn't like him because of the recount mess, and he blew every one of them.
  
  okay...
• Writerbuckeye

  

  LOL at your proof.
  
  Actual media organizations (something like 8 of them) went through EVERY BALLOT in Florida and recounted time and again -- and every time Bush won the election.
  
  Given the overt HATRED the media has for Bush, if there were even one scintilla of evidence that cheating occurred, it would have been national headlines for weeks. Hell, if there was even a hint of a scintilla of evidence, we'd have heard about it over and over again.
  
  As for the original topic: You reap what you sow. Obama LIED repeatedly during his campaign about various aspects of his presidency. Now you wonder why people are coming to revile what he's attempting to do?
  
  Oh and don't confuse hating the POLICIES for hating the MAN.
  
  The left hated and despised Bush the man -- they made that perfectly clear.
  
  Most of the people I know don't hate Obama -- we just loathe and despise almost everything he's come to stand for. Honestly, we could care less about him.
• Elliot Stabler

  You haven't come to hate anything..
  
  You never gave the man a chance from the very beginning and that's pretty sad
  
  
  I recall you and other republicans on JJHuddle back during the general election talking about how bad he was and how you would never give him a chance
• Cleveland Buck

  

  We shouldn't have to give him a chance. Fuck him. I shouldn't have to be worried who is running the federal government. It shouldn't play such a huge role in everyone's life.
• Elliot Stabler

  Wow Buck....
  
  
  You really are an ignorant bastard
  
  Bet you would've given John Mccain or Mitt Romney a f'n chance though huh