Who Wins 2016 Presidential Election?

• fish82

  

  Devils Advocate;1624177 wrote:That and you still owe 2kool a vasectomy....

  Hard for him to collect as he and his 25 alters have been banned back to the yappi GB. :laugh:
• fish82

  

  In a moderately shocking turn of events, Diane Sawyer seems to have inexplicably come down with a sudden desire to do her fucking job for a change.
  
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2014/06/10/abc-newss-diane-sawyer-destroys-hillary-rodham-clinton-on-benghazi/
• gut

  Almost 2.5 years is a long time, but Hillary's inevitability has taken some major hits the last week or so.
• QuakerOats

  isadore;1624539 wrote:gosh a ruddies that would be your opinion of them, their programs and ideology as you become irrelevant, ideologically and demographically.

  
  gosh a ruddies ...... The Tea Party just took down the #2 man in House - Eric Cantor.
  
  All's well that ends well.
• gut

  The lobbyists are probably already lining-up to offer Cantor 7-figures.
• isadore

  QuakerOats;1624825 wrote:gosh a ruddies ...... The Tea Party just took down the #2 man in House - Eric Cantor.
  
  All's well that ends well.

  lol, gosh a ruddies that is not the end. If it was Richard Mourdock, Christine O' Donnell, Sharon Angle, Todd Akiband Joe Miller would be in the US Senate today. Thanks for defeating a Republican who could win in a general election in his district. And defeating based on his supposed support for immigration reform, should really help the party with Hispanics. Demography is destiny.
• QuakerOats

  It is nice to see a party rid itself of outliers/fakes; I wonder when the democrat party which has been completely hijacked by marxists, i.e. progressives, and other collectivists, will do its purging. NEVER, apparently.
• IggyPride00

  

  Tonight's defeat of Cantor might have literally inaugurated Hillary.
  
  Immigration reform is absolutely dead now as Cantor's support for it is seen as a primary reason for his loss. The establishment is going to be running scared, and Boehner will never bring an immigration bill to the floor now.
  
  The Democrats will use this to fire up the Latinos like never before like they did with Willard's self-deport comment, and the GOP can't win on white people alone in a national election.
  
  The House will be almost ungovernable over the next 2 years because of what happened tonight.
• gut

  IggyPride00;1624852 wrote: The House will be almost ungovernable over the next 2 years because of what happened tonight.

  I wouldn't buy into that meme just yet....Lyndsey Graham, after all, defeated his TEA Party challengers convincingly...and he CO-SPONSORED the amnesty bill.
• isadore

  QuakerOats;1624848 wrote:It is nice to see a party rid itself of outliers/fakes; I wonder when the democrat party which has been completely hijacked by marxists, i.e. progressives, and other collectivists, will do its purging. NEVER, apparently.

  The Federalists and the Whigs are no more. And now Gosh a ruddies the Republican Party self destructs.
• fish82

  

  While it's interesting that someone of such a high rank got dinged in the primary, there's really no evidence that it's going to have any far-reaching effects. Cantor peaked in 2009, and has been on a downward slide since. He lost because he lost touch with the voters in his district.
  
  There really isn't any more to it than that.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Turned on the tv this morning and I heard someone on the today show say, "Hillary has taken a lot of criticism, the main one being she hasn't really done anything as Secretary of State. But asked how she would grade herself as SS, Hillary said an A."
  
  Lol turned it immediately.
• QuakerOats

  fish82;1624876 wrote:While it's interesting that someone of such a high rank got dinged in the primary, there's really no evidence that it's going to have any far-reaching effects. Cantor peaked in 2009, and has been on a downward slide since. He lost because he lost touch with the voters in his district.
  
  There really isn't any more to it than that.

  Correct, and he probably was getting comfortable being a caretaker instead of fighting to get back to what made this country great in the first place. Brat favors free markets and much less centralized government. Since many people (at least most republicans and high information voters) are realizing that every federal government program is basically a failure, it is understandable how Brat won.
• Heretic

  

  gut;1624857 wrote:I wouldn't buy into that meme just yet....Lyndsey Graham, after all, defeated his TEA Party challengers convincingly...and he CO-SPONSORED the amnesty bill.

  You are talking to iQQy the Doomsayer, you know? If it isn't doom and gloom, it isn't worth typing about in his mind.
• Classyposter58

  

  Ha you all should read the WSJ article on her book. Absolutely destroys her
• Tiernan

  Unless the GOP finds an effective front runner by the end of December '14 (and that seems extremely unlikely at this point)...get ready for another Clinton WH.
• Dr Winston O'Boogie

  

  Tiernan;1625863 wrote:Unless the GOP finds an effective front runner by the end of December '14 (and that seems extremely unlikely at this point)...get ready for another Clinton WH.

  
  I hope you're wrong, but I think you are right. The republicans haven't had a decent candidate since 1992. The Clinton Machine is formidable and will wipe out any of these religious nut jobs. The GOP better get itself moving.
• gut

  I'm a little surprised by the media scrutiny of Hillary, even at this early stage (still plenty of time to circle the wagons). She doesn't remotely look like the inevitable candidate she did a month ago.
  
  It's almost like some invisible puppet master is pulling strings to set-up an Elizabeth Warren run. I think Schweitzer could be really, really interesting. He's pretty charismatic, especially compared to Robillary...the question is can a moderate win a primary?
  
  I think Hillary is starting to look beatable. Schweitzer would not be, because he takes away too many wedge issues from Repubs.
• QuakerOats

  Dr Winston O'Boogie;1626038 wrote: The Clinton Machine is formidable and will wipe out any of these religious nut jobs. The GOP better get itself moving.

  Just amazing ........ anyone who goes to Church on Sunday is a religious nut job these days..... the Left has lost it, completely.
• Tiernan

  ^^^
  yep basically that's right.
• believer

  

  QuakerOats;1626107 wrote:Just amazing ........ anyone who goes to Church on Sunday is a religious nut job these days..... the Left has lost it, completely.

  You don't even have to go to church anymore. Just a simple admission that you're Christian qualifies you as a religious nut job from the enlightened, open-minded, and and tolerant left.
• believer

  

  QuakerOats;1626107 wrote:Just amazing ........ anyone who goes to Church on Sunday is a religious nut job these days..... the Left has lost it, completely.

  You don't even have to go to church anymore. Just a simple admission that you're Christian qualifies you as a religious nut job from the enlightened, open-minded, and tolerant left.
• JD413

  

  believer;1626126 wrote:You don't even have to go to church anymore. Just a simple admission that you're Christian qualifies you as a religious nut job from the enlightened, open-minded, and tolerant left.

  I love hearing these words in conjunction with libs. Makes for a nice chuckle.
• fish82

  

  Watching Hilary's interviews pimping her crappy book this week has been downright painful. Me thinks her fan club has been too caught up in the coronation prep to remember that she is, in fact, an incredibly inept campaigner.
• believer

  

  fish82;1627299 wrote:Watching Hilary's interviews pimping her crappy book this week has been downright painful. Me thinks her fan club has been too caught up in the coronation prep to remember that she is, in fact, an incredibly inept campaigner.

  Nothing that the lamestream media won't gloss over when the 2016 campaign is in full gear.