Archive

Voting rights... who should not be able to vote

  • Belly35
    Sepia mofo SEPIA

    Sepia it sound better, adds a little class, gives a mystique and a better representation of skin tone..

    Black man … Caramel man …. Brown man …..wait for it Sepia man

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sepia_(color)
  • pmoney25
    Belly35;1582772 wrote:Property owner gets two votes .... everyone else one
    College Grads gets two vote, high school/GED grads get one and drop out get zero
    Employed and retired workers and retire military get to vote, unemployed gets zero
    CCW qualified get one vote, can't quailify for a CCW get zero vote
    Small Business owner gets two votes

    I would get 8 votes .... this is a good thing
    Im sure this is half sarcasm, if not. What a hypocrite. You cannot claim to be for freedom and liberty and want to deny American citizens the right to vote.
  • pmoney25
    QuakerOats;1582765 wrote:Morons: One should have to pass a basic competency test in order to vote.

    Freeloaders: No one should be able to vote themselves the treasury if they contribute nothing to it.
    And you claim to be a liberty loving patriot conservative? You cannot keep yapping on about freedom, then want to deny others the same freedoms.
  • rmolin73
    TedSheckler;1582881 wrote:Do you have at least one white parent?

    :)
    Nope. Dammit!!!!!!
    Belly35;1582882 wrote:Sepia mofo SEPIA

    Sepia it sound better, adds a little class, gives a mystique and a better representation of skin tone..

    Black man … Caramel man …. Brown man …..wait for it Sepia man

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sepia_(color)
    Sepia is a little dark. Sepia Man sounds like a porn star.
  • Heretic
    pmoney25;1582950 wrote:And you claim to be a liberty loving patriot conservative? You cannot keep yapping on about freedom, then want to deny others the same freedoms.
    Man, you've been here since '09 and are just figuring out that this site's primary liberty loving patriot conservatives only care about liberty and freedom for people who think exactly like they do?

    That's what happens when your party winds up as losers on the big stage. Instead of trying to figure out and work on the disconnect between it and its goals and the American people, just throw a fit, whine and look for ways to exclude people with differing views.

    Losers are losers.
  • QuakerOats
    pmoney25;1582950 wrote:And you claim to be a liberty loving patriot conservative? You cannot keep yapping on about freedom, then want to deny others the same freedoms.

    No one is denying anyone their freedoms. With rights come responsibilities. Unfortunately, many want the rights without assuming the responsibilities. There is nothing preventing morons and freeloaders from becoming smarter and productive.

    Good luck.
  • pmoney25
    QuakerOats;1583103 wrote:No is denying anyone their freedoms. With rights come responsibilities. Unfortunately, many want the rights without assuming the responsibilities. There is nothing preventing morons and freeloaders from becoming smarter and productive.

    Good luck.
    You are the main reason people associate the term conservative with ignorant and hypocrite while Libertarian Conservatives like myself have to defend ourselves from people who lump us together with crazy tea baggers.

    Believe me if intelligence and productivity were a requirement, the tea party would be cut in half.
  • I Wear Pants
    ernest_t_bass;1582403 wrote:Anyone who is under the age of 18, and who is not a legal citizen. There really should be no other (idiotic) reasoning for one to not be able to vote.
    This. If you're a citizen above the age of 18 who is registered to vote you should be allowed to vote. That's it.
  • QuakerOats
    pmoney25;1583165 wrote:You are the main reason people associate the term conservative with ignorant and hypocrite while Libertarian Conservatives like myself have to defend ourselves from people who lump us together with crazy tea baggers.

    Believe me if intelligence and productivity were a requirement, the tea party would be cut in half.

    Thank you for sharing your wisdom. I know those tea party folks are nuts; they stand for individual liberty and fiscal sanity; how crazy is that.
  • believer
    Heretic;1583094 wrote:Instead of trying to figure out and work on the disconnect between it and its goals and the American people, just throw a fit, whine and look for ways to exclude people with differing views.
    You mean liberals? I see what you did there.
  • pmoney25
    QuakerOats;1583216 wrote:Thank you for sharing your wisdom. I know those tea party folks are nuts; they stand for individual liberty and fiscal sanity; how crazy is that.
    That would be nice if it were true as I believe those things but keep on listening to Mark Levin for your next opinion.
  • gut
    Yeah, the Tea Party has it's crazies just like the right and left, but I wouldn't characterize it as the party of crazy or anything more radical than liberty and fiscal responsibility....what I DO know is both the Dems and Repubs, with a lot of help from their buddies in the media, have attacked it pretty mercilessly and unfairly because they view it as a threat to their own power.

    Funny that you describe them as "crazy tea baggers", which is a term you really only hear from the likes of Bill Maher and Jon Stewart.
  • pmoney25
    gut;1583278 wrote:Yeah, the Tea Party has it's crazies just like the right and left, but I wouldn't characterize it as the party of crazy or anything more radical than liberty and fiscal responsibility....what I DO know is both the Dems and Repubs, with a lot of help from their buddies in the media, have attacked it pretty mercilessly and unfairly because they view it as a threat to their own power.

    Funny that you describe them as "crazy tea baggers", which is a term you really only hear from the likes of Bill Maher and Jon Stewart.
    What is funny? You caught me, Im really Isadore and Boatshoes rolled into one giant liberal.

    The tea party started off with great intentions. I just feel it has spent more time bitching about Obama than doing anything else to further the agenda. That is my gripe. They spend time whining about gays, birth control, Obamas birth certificate instead of offering idea

    While I say they are crazy, it pales in comparison to being as crazy as a progressive liberal.
  • gut
    pmoney25;1583299 wrote: The tea party started off with great intentions. I just feel it has spent more time bitching about Obama than doing anything else to further the agenda. That is my gripe. They spend time whining about gays, birth control, Obamas birth certificate instead of offering idea
    I don't deny it's been somewhat hijacked/infiltrated by some whackos, but I don't feel the whackos are really running the movement - but that is a narrative pushed at every opportunity by liberals, Rhinos, and the media.

    Ted Cruz is a poser. To me, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio are the real leaders of the Tea Party, and I don't remotely consider either to be a whacko nutjob. Or Sarah Palin, for that matter - I don't think she's particularly bright but I do think she is genuine.
  • QuakerOats
    ^^^ agree
  • BoatShoes
    gut;1583301 wrote:I don't deny it's been somewhat hijacked/infiltrated by some whackos, but I don't feel the whackos are really running the movement - but that is a narrative pushed at every opportunity by liberals, Rhinos, and the media.

    Ted Cruz is a poser. To me, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio are the real leaders of the Tea Party, and I don't remotely consider either to be a whacko nutjob. Or Sarah Palin, for that matter - I don't think she's particularly bright but I do think she is genuine.
    You're right on Rand Paul but you're wrong on Ted Cruz. You may think he's a poser (which he is...He is the Republican Party's version of Obama) but the Tea Party loves him. Also, Marco Rubio has largely been excommunicated for his stance on immigration.

    Here are the results of a recent Tea Party Presidential Poll.
    1. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz-84 percent.2. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul-80 percent.
    3. Dr. Ben Carson-77 percent.
    4. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker-70 percent.
    5. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin-64 percent.
    6. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee-59 percent.
    7. Texas Gov. Rick Perry-59 percent.
    8. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal-56 percent.
    9. South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley-55 percent.
    10. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio-52 percent.
    11. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice-48 percent.
    12. Former Sen. Rick Santorum-46 percent.
    13. Rep. Paul Ryan-45 percent.
    14. Ohio Gov. John Kasich-42 percent.
    15. Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin-41 percent.
    16. Indiana Gov. Mike Pence-41 percent.
    17. New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez-41 percent.
    18. Rep. Steve King-37 percent.
    19. New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte-30 percent.
    20. Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr.-29 percent.
    21. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush-29 percent.
    22. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie-15 percent.
    The whackos are running the movement. And anytime somebody sensible like Thomas Sowell comes out says something like "Ted Cruz is only out for himself" they risk being labeled a RINO or worse an "Establishment Republican" lol. They cost the GOP control of the Senate and the only Tea Partier candidates they managed to get in there, Mike Lee and Ted Cruz are making the GOP look like a giant pile of derp to most Americans who are not Orthodox Conservatives.
  • gut
    There are a lot of good names on that list, certainly not crazy. Not as radical as the jabbers THAT DO RUN the Democratic Party - Reid, Pelosi, Feinstein, Wasserman-Schultz, Valerie Jarrett....at least Barney Frank retired.