8.3 now 8.5 come election day

• Belly35

  

  It doesn't matter what you Liberals, Democrat Obama jock strap and the bias media prints and tries to spin Obama agenda is a failure …...
  
  Belly predicts 8.5 unemployment by election .... What a failure Obama is
  
  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/03/economy-adds-163000-jobs-in-july-unemployment-rate-rises-to-83-percent/
• cruiser_96

  

  It's the new normal, you bigot!
• Belly35

  

  cruiser_96;1239593 wrote:It's the new normal, you bigot!

  :huh: So a bigot is someone who presents the facts, truth and comments can be justified?
• cruiser_96

  

  Fine! You homophobe!
• Belly35

  

  cruiser_96;1239627 wrote:Fine! You homophobe!

  Obama gay?
  
  First Black
  First Slave
  First Gay What could be next ????? First foreign student :laugh:
• cruiser_96

  

  Oh, a racist, too!?
  
  95 days until the wheels arein motion to make him the first one term president in the 21st certury! That is change we can agree with!
  
  ps: Obama could very well have Native American in him. I think I read that on the OC once.
• cruiser_96

  

  Why wouldn't they show that??????????
  
  One of the problems with our government, and politics in general , is that there is no appreciation for what is true, only attempts to find what is personally appealing. How can we fix anything if we are not made aware of the true problem.
  
  #HouseOfCards
• Belly35

  

  I read someplace that the black unemployment average is around 17 percent. Would the bias media print those facts.....
• NilesPacMan

  ccrunner609;1239672 wrote:Whats sucks is that they wont publish the real unemployment rate. I believe that its prolly around 12%

  
  They actually do! It's called the U-6, and it's currently at 14.9%. I'd publish the link, but I'm on my phone.
• gut

  You're looking at it wrong. This represents a dependent group that will gladly vote for Obama to keep the welfare checks rolling in. Why have an honest 40hr-wk job when for 30 minutes of work at the polls you can vote to keep the eagle sh.itting?
• tk421

  

  if the numbers actually showed those out of work, it would be 11+. No way Obama would be reelected.
• cruiser_96

  

  tk421;1239843 wrote:if the numbers actually showed those out of work, it would be 11+. No way Obama would be reelected.

  The more I uncover appart from what my nightly news and "popular" newspapers tell me, the unhappier I get.
• password

  

  Obama will be re-elected regardless of what we think. The African Americans will vote for him no matter what their employment situation is, because he has them believing that he is finally getting even with the white people for all the sacrifices African Americans had to endure. Now if for some shocking reason that he doesn't win election, there will be lawsuits filed to have the election overturned because of voter id laws and discrimination against minority voters and then the attorney general will step in and reverse the decision. We are screwed for 4 more years because he has not accomplished his goal of destroying the U.S and turning us in to a third rate country and punishing the white people because of his racist ideology.
• IggyPride00

  

  Belly, I saw this bumper sticker recently and it made me think it was something you might like to have on your car.
  
  
• Footwedge

  password;1240178 wrote:Obama will be re-elected regardless of what we think. The African Americans will vote for him no matter what their employment situation is, because he has them believing that he is finally getting even with the white people for all the sacrifices African Americans had to endure. Now if for some shocking reason that he doesn't win election, there will be lawsuits filed to have the election overturned because of voter id laws and discrimination against minority voters and then the attorney general will step in and reverse the decision. We are screwed for 4 more years because he has not accomplished his goal of destroying the U.S and turning us in to a third rate country and punishing the white people because of his racist ideology.

  LOL. You are very entertaining Password. Keep up the good work. BTW, I heard that Travon Martin beat you up when you were a kid.. Is that true?
• password

  

  Footwedge;1240589 wrote:LOL. You are very entertaining Password. Keep up the good work. BTW, I heard that Travon Martin beat you up when you were a kid.. Is that true?

  I am glad you find it funny, but maybe you need to listen to some of the blacks when asked why they are voting for Obama.
• I Wear Pants

  password;1240777 wrote:I am glad you find it funny, but maybe you need to listen to some of the blacks when asked why they are voting for Obama.

  Same thing for some of the whites when asked why they are voting for anyone but Obama.
  
  Don't think that the people who disagree with you have a monopoly on stupidity or bad intentions.
• stlouiedipalma

  ccrunner609;1239672 wrote:Whats sucks is that they wont publish the real unemployment rate. I believe that its prolly around 12%

  
  Step back for a minute and consider what a ridiculous statement that is.
  
  Let's say that Mitt wins the election in November. Do you think for a minute that, as President, he will suddenly state that these statistics are wrong and suddenly embrace a higher unemployment rate? Mitt may be crazy, but he's certainly not stupid.
• Heretic

  

  password;1240777 wrote:I am glad you find it funny, but maybe you need to listen to some of the blacks when asked why they are voting for Obama.

  As opposed to the birthers and the people who use his middle name as a "SEE HE'S A MUSLIM DAMNIT" mantra and and grasped at similar straws that likely wouldn't have been brought up if he was a white dude.
  
  Dumbasses on both sides of the fence. Can't blame stupid on one race/group/political party, as there's more than enough to go around.
• ptown_trojans_1

  

  I've said it before and I'll say it again, we are in a period of low or stagnated growth. The administration's idea that we would be below 7.5% was fantasy from the start. None of the macroeconomic factor signaled that. The market is too timid and unstable for short term high growth.
  As a result of the administration setting the bar too high, and faltered, they are playing catch up now with the narrative and failing.
  Are the Obama policy's failing? If you go by their own metric in 2009-10, then yes. Are they continuing to build growth, sort of.
  
  Bottom line is though, I don't think who is in the White House matters with the economy, as the system is so large that the Executive Branch has little or no forecast ability. Almost all policies are reactionary.
  If McCain was in the White House, the economy would be in the same shape, I would image, as his policies would not have been much different.
  
  That said, the American public vote on the economy, and the President takes the fall. If the Obama White House continues to get small, slow growth, which I expect, Romney has a real shot of winning.
  
  But, I seriously doubt the election of Romney will end the period of slow growth. Romney will face the same sick system full of boom and busts, and low growth, and he won't have the power to influence it.
• password

  

  Heretic;1241212 wrote:As opposed to the birthers and the people who use his middle name as a "SEE HE'S A MUSLIM DAMNIT" mantra and and grasped at similar straws that likely wouldn't have been brought up if he was a white dude.
  
  Dumbasses on both sides of the fence. Can't blame stupid on one race/group/political party, as there's more than enough to go around.

  This I agree with. My beef is not that he is black, but that he has destroyed the country and has divided the races more than any other president, just so he can get elected. He is a sham and people need to open their eyes. He wants to evenly distribute the wealth, but he should be making sure that people are equally working to gain their own wealth, not waiting for Obama to take from the rich and give to the lazy.
• stlouiedipalma

  ptown_trojans_1;1241259 wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again, we are in a period of low or stagnated growth. The administration's idea that we would be below 7.5% was fantasy from the start. None of the macroeconomic factor signaled that. The market is too timid and unstable for short term high growth.
  As a result of the administration setting the bar too high, and faltered, they are playing catch up now with the narrative and failing.
  Are the Obama policy's failing? If you go by their own metric in 2009-10, then yes. Are they continuing to build growth, sort of.
  
  Bottom line is though, I don't think who is in the White House matters with the economy, as the system is so large that the Executive Branch has little or no forecast ability. Almost all policies are reactionary.
  If McCain was in the White House, the economy would be in the same shape, I would image, as his policies would not have been much different.
  
  That said, the American public vote on the economy, and the President takes the fall. If the Obama White House continues to get small, slow growth, which I expect, Romney has a real shot of winning.
  
  But, I seriously doubt the election of Romney will end the period of slow growth. Romney will face the same sick system full of boom and busts, and low growth, and he won't have the power to influence it.

  ptown, you make a great point here, but what does that say about the electorate? Are people really that dumb to believe that one man can magically make everything good again? The recession was so great, so deep that there was no way it was going to be reversed in four years. If I really thought that Mitt could turn everything around he would get my vote. My fear is that the government-cutters will gain power and use the hatchet instead of the scalpel. If that happens, I fear that things will get much, much worse.
• rmolin73

  

  password;1241410 wrote:This I agree with. My beef is not that he is black, but that he has destroyed the country and has divided the races more than any other president, just so he can get elected. He is a sham and people need to open their eyes. He wants to evenly distribute the wealth, but he should be making sure that people are equally working to gain their own wealth, not waiting for Obama to take from the rich and give to the lazy.

  You can't be serious.
• believer

  

  stlouiedipalma;1241477 wrote:ptown, you make a great point here, but what does that say about the electorate? Are people really that dumb to believe that one man can magically make everything good again?

  Um....yes?
  
  
• tk421

  

  believer;1241505 wrote:Um....yes?
  
  

  lol, yes the whole premise with Obama was that one man would be completely different than any other politician, as if that would ever happen. The American public was completely fooled, this administration has continued and even upped the policies that the public "claimed" to hate so much from Bush.