Rick Santorum wants to take away your porn...
-
I Wear Pants
Your mother sounds awesome.fish82;1121240 wrote:Yesterday my mom called him "Scrotorum." I LOLed pretty hard. -
QuakerOatsjustincredible;1119202 wrote:I think I'd vote for Obama if Santorum were the R candidate.
I would never make that mistake. -
ts1227
It really is just a matter of for what reason you get classified as retarded if you pick Obama or Santorum, because anyone that votes for either one is pretty retarded.QuakerOats;1121329 wrote:I would never make that mistake. -
justincredible
Indeed.ts1227;1121369 wrote:It really is just a matter of for what reason you get classified as retarded if you pick Obama or Santorum, because anyone that votes for either one is pretty retarded.
And no, I will not be voting for Obama no matter who the R candidate is. But if I had, HAD, to choose between the two I'd go with Obama. And then I'd kill myself. -
fish82
Same.justincredible;1121402 wrote:Indeed.
And no, I will not be voting for Obama no matter who the R candidate is. But if I had, HAD, to choose between the two I'd go with Obama. And then I'd kill myself.
During the same conversation with Mama Fish where she christened him "Scrotorum," I pretty much established that if those were my choices, I'd just skip on to the next line...or more likely just write my own name in. -
gut
This is true. But at least Santorum has a chance, no matter how small, of NOT failing.ts1227;1121369 wrote:It really is just a matter of for what reason you get classified as retarded if you pick Obama or Santorum, because anyone that votes for either one is pretty retarded. -
I Wear Pants
This.justincredible;1121402 wrote:Indeed.
And no, I will not be voting for Obama no matter who the R candidate is. But if I had, HAD, to choose between the two I'd go with Obama. And then I'd kill myself. -
I Wear Pants
-
majorspark
I have a greater concern with the president in power who is currentlly interjecting the federal goverment into the bedroom than than a dude that has no statistical chance of gaining the power to do so. -
believer
But - hey - some would rather vote for the guy who is, in fact, already using Federal power to interfere with our health care, freedom of religion & other Constitutional violations, free flow of commerce, etc. than take their chances on a "kook" who tells the religious right what they want to hear.majorspark;1121810 wrote:I have a greater concern with the president in power who is currentlly interjecting the federal goverment into the bedroom than than a dude that has no statistical chance of gaining the power to do so.
I guess it's a "better the devil you know than the devil you don't" scenario? -
ThinthickbigredI wish people like him would put more emphisis on the economy ,and special interest lobbyist instead of trying to be the moral police. Its all a facade . Get on with more important topics
-
believer
I agree. It's time for the MSM to stop demonizing the Repub candidates and focus on the real issues. Naw....that would make Obama look bad.Thinthickbigred;1122476 wrote:I wish people like him would put more emphisis on the economy ,and special interest lobbyist instead of trying to be the moral police. Its all a facade . Get on with more important topics -
BGFalcons82
Paul Harvey was always very inspiring to hear. His words in your link were never truer and he spoke them 47 years ago.
Of course, now, cue up the secular humanists and the usual atheists that there is no God, no Devil, no need to worry, it's fantasy-land, blah blah, blah, puke. -
believer
Ah yes...moral relativism. Good day!BGFalcons82;1123264 wrote:Paul Harvey was always very inspiring to hear. His words in your link were never truer and he spoke them 47 years ago.
Of course, now, cue up the secular humanists and the usual atheists that there is no God, no Devil, no need to worry, it's fantasy-land, blah blah, blah, puke.