Archive

Looks like we better start spending more on the military...

  • derek bomar
    we're slackin on our pimpin....

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-china-military-20110107,0,3324067.story

    personally, I don't give two shits if China can do this or not, as any war we fight with them is the end of days anyway
  • ptown_trojans_1
    Here is a pretty good article on the bird:
    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/awst/2011/01/03/AW_01_03_2011_p18-279564.xml&headline=China%27s%20J-20%20Stealth%20Fighter%20In%20Taxi%20Tests

    It is still years away from being deployed and is an offshoot of the new Russian fighter. Thing is the bird is huge, and I mean huge, bigger than an F-22, which is large.
    But, all of this goes to the image that China is rising miltiary wise to combat the U.S. and I'm not so sure of the evidence yet.

    It simply appears China is simply updating their miltiary, which all countries do.

    Sure, other states in the region are a little worried, but I don't think this really changes things.
  • Belly35
    ptown_trojans_1;628918 wrote:Here is a pretty good article on the bird:
    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/awst/2011/01/03/AW_01_03_2011_p18-279564.xml&headline=China%27s%20J-20%20Stealth%20Fighter%20In%20Taxi%20Tests

    It is still years away from being deployed and is an offshoot of the new Russian fighter. Thing is the bird is huge, and I mean huge, bigger than an F-22, which is large.
    But, all of this goes to the image that China is rising miltiary wise to combat the U.S. and I'm not so sure of the evidence yet.

    It simply appears China is simply updating their miltiary, which all countries do.

    Sure, other states in the region are a little worried, but I don't think this really changes things.

    Lets sign a meaningless "Treaty" that will alway be the first line of defence to limit the future development of weapons.
  • FatHobbit
    China's development of stealth fighter takes U.S. by surprise
    isn't the point of a stealth fighter to "surprise" someone?
  • ptown_trojans_1
    Belly35;628929 wrote:Lets sign a meaningless "Treaty" that will alway be the first line of defence to limit the future development of weapons.

    What treaty?'
    What limit?
    Huh?
  • Belly35
    ptown_trojans_1;628934 wrote:What treaty?'
    What limit?
    Huh?
    It was a stealth joke and you missed it ...........
  • ptown_trojans_1
    Belly35;628947 wrote:It was a stealth joke and you missed it ...........

    ok......
  • IggyPride00
    China announced a smaller-than-usual 7.5 percent increase to $76.3 billion last year — the second largest defense budget in the world behind the United States.
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40961787/ns/world_news-asiapacific/

    I saw this in an article this morning about Gates going over there and it is mind blowing. Even assuming they are understating what they are really spending on defense, we are still spending almost 6 or 7 times what they are.

    People wonder why our country is going broke and China is eating our lunch. The second largest military budget in the world is probably around $120 billion (probably closer to what China is actually spending) and we are up around $700 billion and that doesn't even take into account absolutely all of the war and other misc. spending.
  • Mr. 300
    Belly, PTown's a huge nerd...he misses things a lot.
  • ptown_trojans_1
    Mr. 300;629268 wrote:Belly, PTown's a huge nerd...he misses things a lot.

    Hahaha. True, true.
    I prefer the term wonk though, but yes, I'm a huge nerd.
  • believer
    ptown_trojans_1;628934 wrote:What treaty?'
    What limit?
    Huh?
    You sound like a Russian, Ptown. :p
  • ptown_trojans_1
    believer;629888 wrote:You sound like a Russian, Ptown. :p
    Better red than dead :p