D2 Columbus East District pairings are out
-
ohiowrestlingchampamerican guesser;684876 wrote:as posted by the bucksman on another forum:
Con semis: Zoller over Gase (BW), Santos over Miller (WH)
Thats if Gase makes it to conso-semis i think he will have Stephanies (Granville) in the conso-quarters who previously beat him 6-4 in there last meeting -
ksig489Zoller and Gase arent in the same half bracket are they?
-
ohiowrestlingchampno but after the cross bracketing they would meet in the conso semi's... assuming no upsets happened
-
hizzmutherI don't know, but I would trust Bucksman to know where the brackets will cross in the consis and to be aware of where he expects them to drop.
-
iGranby
indeed, hes also an advid tella-tubbies fan, and he cant miss the new episodes on fridayohiowrestlingchamp;685824 wrote:Thats if he even shows up... Rumor has it call of duty is coming out with a new map that weekend -
RussianBearhizzmuther;685864 wrote:I don't know, but I would trust Bucksman to know where the brackets will cross in the consis and to be aware of where he expects them to drop.
Exactly. What's wrong with revising the rankings periodically. It makes more sense than looking at how people placed last year and a few boxscores from tournaments and making one prediction without seeing them actually wrestle. Given the access that many of us have to electronic information, we can probably all make better predictions within certain weight classes. Knowing all of the weight classes is the real challenge. -
ksig489I didnt see he was predicting conso semis...I thought it was a champ semis prediction.
-
mgutrmanHere are my thoughts
103.
1. Burcher
2. Craig
3. Smith
4. Guttierrez
5. Torti
112
1. Langdon
2. Miller
3. Price
4. Moffitt
5. Henderhott
119
1. Fiorucci
2. Warner
3. Blacka
4. Parsons
5. Brock
125
1. Scherer
2. McComas
3. Hutchins
4. Wilson
5. Thompson
130
1. Caserta
2. Mercer
3. Rohskopf
4. Boswell
5. Jones
135
1. Dunlap
2. Jolley
3. McGhee
4. Fosco
5. Johnston
140
1. Warner
2. Maynard
3. Santos
4. Steffeny
5. Stone
145
1. Burkhart
2. Stitzlein
3. Driscoll
4. Allen
5. Staight
152
1. Higgins
2. Ponchak
3. Ferguson
4. Hetterscheidt
5. Riker
160
1. Boyce
2. Zang
3. Baker
4. Gadd
5. Jones
171
1. King
2. Kullman
3. Clark
4. Yeager
5. Porter
189
1. Blankenship
2. Johnson
3. Harble
4. Kent
5. Kelton
215
1. Redman
2. Jackson
3. Shalosky
4. Gordon
5. Dolvin
285
1. Eckroth
2. Willis
3. Young
4. Lehr
5. Pressley -
herbieColumbus East oh my! Lock your doors and set your alarm at this one.
-
Fatmanroll>PetersonThank you Herbie for adding a little bit of ignorance to this discussion about District wrestling, or in your vocab RASSLIN!
-
SidLOL, 160 is way off do more research!
160
1. Boyce Lost to Mays
2. Zang only beat Gadd by 1
3. Baker Lost to ONeil by 1 (Who will be 171 State runner-up or 3rd based on when he wrestles Phillips) *This is your winner hands down!.
4. Gadd..tough kid..but no offense
5. Jones beat Mays...Why this kid and his schedule are not respected more is baffling.
Not sure what it is but hate seeing ppl rank based on Brackman or god forbid Bucksman. Dig a little harder and look up results on your own and dont coatail others and play it off as your "predictions". Re-roll. -
iGranby
Zing!Sid;687250 wrote:Not sure what it is but hate seeing ppl rank based on Brackman or god forbid Bucksman. Dig a little harder and look up results on your own and dont coatail others and play it off as your "predictions". Re-roll. -
mgutrmanSid;687250 wrote:LOL, 160 is way off do more research!
160
1. Boyce Lost to Mays
2. Zang only beat Gadd by 1
3. Baker Lost to ONeil by 1 (Who will be 171 State runner-up or 3rd based on when he wrestles Phillips) *This is your winner hands down!.
4. Gadd..tough kid..but no offense
5. Jones beat Mays...Why this kid and his schedule are not respected more is baffling.
Not sure what it is but hate seeing ppl rank based on Brackman or god forbid Bucksman. Dig a little harder and look up results on your own and dont coatail others and play it off as your "predictions". Re-roll.
Sid are you a little "SLOW"? Breakman or Bucksman didn't see this weight the same as me. I did my rankings on what I have see in person and results on the net. This is my thoughts on this weight class, If you don't like them make your own. Maybe you will pick better than I have maybe not. But you shouldn't attack me and say I coppied anyone when you have not seen my bracket. FYI I have Jones losing first round to Gadd also. Would I bet my house on it no, but it is what I think. I didn't care before but now I will sit and cheer on Gadd. I don't care who wins I just hope you are wrong. The only thing I know for sure is we will see on friday.. Good luck to you and whom ever you will be rooting for. -
Dad4Sports125 lbs
Hutchins 4 Scherer 5 McComas 6 Wilson 8 Thompson 15 .....Breakman Rankings
I don't think there have been many head-to-head matches among these 5 wrestlers have there? Hutchins pinned Scherer in the "go to state" match 2 years ago...but that it so long ago it can basically be disregarded. Scherer topped McComas in last year's district semis (8-5).
Any other head-to head results out there? It seems strange these guys have not met up more often..... -
DirtyscrambleSid;687250 wrote:LOL, 160 is way off do more research!
160
1. Boyce Lost to Mays
2. Zang only beat Gadd by 1
3. Baker Lost to ONeil by 1 (Who will be 171 State runner-up or 3rd based on when he wrestles Phillips) *This is your winner hands down!.
4. Gadd..tough kid..but no offense
5. Jones beat Mays...Why this kid and his schedule are not respected more is baffling.
Not sure what it is but hate seeing ppl rank based on Brackman or god forbid Bucksman. Dig a little harder and look up results on your own and dont coatail others and play it off as your "predictions". Re-roll.
I like you, but that post was ignorant lol, i think Boyce is the best kid in this weight, Baker is the 2nd best, but im guessing Bracket Screwed him, And Gadds Resume Shows hes is tough as nails.
His Mgutrmans Prediction, AT THIS WEIGHT* i think is spot on -
Westie101Dirtyscramble;688019 wrote:I like you, but that post was ignorant lol, i think Boyce is the best kid in this weight, Baker is the 2nd best, but im guessing Bracket Screwed him, And Gadds Resume Shows hes is tough as nails.
His Mgutrmans Prediction, AT THIS WEIGHT* i think is spot on
I beat Zang, ONeil, and Higgins. So by the transitive property of trevor fiorucci, this arguement is dumb because im the best. -
Wolverine12----mgutrman----
If your predictions hold true-
Olentangy has 6 SQ's
Licking Heights, Claymont, DeSales, and Granville have 4 SQ's
Licking Valley, Minerva, Stubenville, West Holmes, Dover, Johnathan Alder, have 3 SQ's
Canal Winchester and Hilliard Bradley have 2 SQ's
- Everyone else 1 SQ's or none
-Sounds a little off to me, but we will see this weekend -
mgutrmanWolverine12;688082 wrote:----mgutrman----
If your predictions hold true-
Olentangy has 6 SQ's
Licking Heights, Claymont, DeSales, and Granville have 4 SQ's
Licking Valley, Minerva, Stubenville, West Holmes, Dover, Johnathan Alder, have 3 SQ's
Canal Winchester and Hilliard Bradley have 2 SQ's
- Everyone else 1 SQ's or none
-Sounds a little off to me, but we will see this weekend
Sounds off to me too...lol I didn't look at overall numbers just each weight as I saw it. we'll have to see how it all plays out. Anything can happen, especially in wrestle backs. I still can only see the brackets through my eyes. -
hang_loosemgutrman, Thank You for supporting Delaware County & the wrestlers in that county...
Hey Dad4Sports, I'm thinking Hutchins and Scherer is going to be an awesome match.. -
HeadoutsideI think you are selling a few of the canal Kids a little short. I see it a little different. 112Brady 4th ,125 Hutchens 1st, 130 Boswell 1st or 3rd, 135, Tullius has a shot at making the finals. He pinned Jolley at the cambridge tourament earlier this year. He was winning when he pinned him. Hwt. Presley 2nd or 3rd.mgutrman;686638 wrote:Here are my thoughts
103.
1. Burcher
2. Craig
3. Smith
4. Guttierrez
5. Torti
112
1. Langdon
2. Miller
3. Price
4. Moffitt
5. Henderhott
119
1. Fiorucci
2. Warner
3. Blacka
4. Parsons
5. Brock
125
1. Scherer
2. McComas
3. Hutchins
4. Wilson
5. Thompson
130
1. Caserta
2. Mercer
3. Rohskopf
4. Boswell
5. Jones
135
1. Dunlap
2. Jolley
3. McGhee
4. Fosco
5. Johnston
140
1. Warner
2. Maynard
3. Santos
4. Steffeny
5. Stone
145
1. Burkhart
2. Stitzlein
3. Driscoll
4. Allen
5. Staight
152
1. Higgins
2. Ponchak
3. Ferguson
4. Hetterscheidt
5. Riker
160
1. Boyce
2. Zang
3. Baker
4. Gadd
5. Jones
171
1. King
2. Kullman
3. Clark
4. Yeager
5. Porter
189
1. Blankenship
2. Johnson
3. Harble
4. Kent
5. Kelton
215
1. Redman
2. Jackson
3. Shalosky
4. Gordon
5. Dolvin
285
1. Eckroth
2. Willis
3. Young
4. Lehr
5. Pressley -
Dad4Sports"Possible" quarterfinals that I'm really looking forward to......to borrow a phrase
FRIDAY NIGHT FIREWORKS
103 Smith, Minerva vs Gutierrez, Desales
119 LLewellyn, Steu vs Blacka, Jon Alder
125 Thompson, Lon vs Wilson, Desales
130 Wohrle, Hill Bradley vs Mercer, E Liv
135 Jolley, W Holmes vs Gershom, Lake
135 Fosco, Olen vs Dunlap, L Heights
145 Driscoll, Hill Bradley vs Allen, Desales
145 Straight, Whitehall vs Schenz, Big Wal
152 Ferguson, Desales vs Riker, New Phil
152 Endres, Dov vs Higgins, Hill Brad
152 Ponchak, Morgan vs Hetterscheidt, Olen
189 Robinson, London vs Johnson, Dover
189 Bankenship, Jon Alder vs Kelton, River View
215 Jackson, Hartley/Gunn, Cam winner vs Gordon, Gran
215 Moray, Steu vs Shalosky, Dov
285 Eckworth, Steu vs Pressley, Canal Win
285 Settles, Hamilton T vs Young, Olen -
Dad4SportsIntriguing 1st round match-ups that I'm looking forward to right off the bat
FRIDAY AFTERNOON "ALTERCATIONS"
130 Foster, Beav Loc vs Herron, Clay
130 Hobley, Steu vs Leppla, Cam
140 Bridges, Olen vs Miller, W Holmes
145 Peterman, Jon Alder vs Swartz, Beav Loc
152 Workman, Lick Valley vs McSurley, Jon Alder
160 Gadd, Olen vs Jones, Tri Val
160 Zang, Hartley vs Burcher, IV
189 Kenley, Mifflin vs Neptune, JG
215 Johnson, Clay vs Stinemetz, Olen ** Rematch of MIT Stinemetz won 6-5
215 Jackson, Hartley vs Gunn, Cam -
cruiser_96No, no, no... They are ALL Fireworks!!! 1st round AND second rounds!!! Don't you love the phrase!?
Gonna be great!
Good luck to the area kids! -
RussianBearWolverine12;688082 wrote:----mgutrman----
If your predictions hold true-
Olentangy has 6 SQ's
Licking Heights, Claymont, DeSales, and Granville have 4 SQ's
Licking Valley, Minerva, Stubenville, West Holmes, Dover, Johnathan Alder, have 3 SQ's
Canal Winchester and Hilliard Bradley have 2 SQ's
- Everyone else 1 SQ's or none
-Sounds a little off to me, but we will see this weekend
I don't think it is off at all. There is a reason why Olentangy is ranked 4th in the state and finished 2nd at the State Duals this year. Frankly, I think some of the Olentangy wrestlers are ranked a little low and didn't include Stinemetz at 215 (anything is possible but I don't see how he doesn't make the top 4). It is very possible for this team to qualify 6-7 wrestlers for state. Maybe I've seen them wrestle more than others. I also think we might be underestimating Claymont based on how they have performed this year. My team picks for first and second are Olentangy and Claymont. I just don't see any other team getting close. -
squeekHere is how I got it figured
103
Burcher
Craig
Smith
Gutierrez
112
Langdon
Miller
Price
Moffitt
119
Fiorucci
Warner
Parsons
Blacka
125
Scherer
McComas
Wilson
Thompson
130
Caserta
Rohskopf
Boswell
Herron
135
Dunlap
Johnston
McGee
Fosco
140
Warner
Maynard
Santos
Zoller
145
Burkhart
Stitzlein
Allen
Swartz
152
Higgins
Hetterscheidt
Ricker
Endres
160
Baker
Zang
Boyce
Gadd
171
Kullman
King
Clark
Walters
189
Blankenship
Johnson
Harble
Neptune
215
Shalosky
Redman
Jackson
Shurina
285
Eckroth
VanDyke
Young
Settles
Sectional break down
Buckeye Local 8
Licking Hts. 12
Hilliard Br. 18
Claymont 18